![]() |
| The deep primordial secrets of existence come sprouting forth in the form of a Cosmic garden. The ‘seeds’ of our reality materialize and sprout as if by magic out of a seemingly immaterial ground; but none of this is magic. It’s all common sense and pretty easy to understand once you know the right way to look at it. The Song of Everything is here to show you where to look, and the comfortable path to get there. You’re invited to discover it with us—perhaps from the vantage point of a nice hilltop vista on a clear night, or even from the comforts of your own sofa in your living room! |
It kind of goes without saying that every story needs to have a starting point. And yet, when the story we’re talking about is the *real* one that we’re actually living, deciding on where and how to start the narrative is a super tough call. And yet there’s no story whose starting point matters more.
How did Everything start? What forces came together to form this great big complex universe that we find ourselves in? This is our ‘Origin Story’—our ‘Creation Myth,’ as it used to be called.
The image with its caption above is the way we choose to begin ours—the start of our Comfortable Universe’s story that we’re calling the ‘Song of Everything.’
Everybody is going to have their own favorite way of presenting this story, and they should, because ultimately, it’s a personal story.
Should the story be personalized and customized, or institutionalized and standardized?
Short answer: Yes.
Long answer—we’ll be arguing that the individual takes precedence over any establishment, consensus, or institution. You’ll have to read on to find that discussion, but it means that we favor the special individual twists … and our version has plenty of them.
The institutional version of the Creation Story that your host grew up with is the Judeo-Christian one. It starts with the “In the beginning …” that readers encounter when they open the foundational text to page 1, line 1.
In the Bible, before there was a garden, the world was a Formless Void over which the restless breath of God began to stir. That part works for us, or at least we’re going to keep it in mind. It’s short and to the point. There is no consideration of God’s prior gigs. The story quickly homes in on his big seven-day project—the garden of Eden.
Our Song of Everything doesn’t stick with that tradition or any other. It takes cues from Western thinking and the Judeo-Christian Creation Myth because they’re your host’s cultural background, but we also tap into many other sources.
We find it convenient, however, to start with that garden metaphor. And that Biblical Formless Void features as well. It is the source of the ‘ground’—the ‘magic’ soil out of which our particular garden sprouts, but without the need for a creator being to make it happen.
Mind you, we do allow that a Creator-being *could* be the first thing, or one of the first things, that sprouts. Not a supernatural being—we see no need for miracles or magic in the creation—but a far more powerful being than any human, and with the basic personality and capabilities of your favorite god or goddess. Such paths are certainly not ruled out.
But are they the most likely—the most reasonable—the path with the fewest hurdles? Our goal here at Comfortable Universe HQ is to identify the most basic, underlying garden soil—the place from which all the World’s diverse Creation Myths might have emerged. In previous work, we’ve called this venue “Eden’s Womb”—the sheltered, comfortable mammalian-style “nest” where all creation stories could be conceived.
Before we delve further into how we generalize the story, we first share a quick (biased) sampler of three more favorite highly abridged ancient Creation Myths from cultures far and wide, and then one ‘non-Myth’, highlighting a few points that have relevance to our story:
One: Egypt
One of the very oldest Creation Myths on record comes from Egypt, where, in one version, the term zp tpj (“the first time”) is used to denote a moment of transition from primordial chaos to the world in existence. Nu was that chaotic sea of lifeless waters. In it Atum began to consolidate as an inert potential being (closely associated with the more familiar sun god Ra). He became a functioning self-engendered god, who, being alone, resorted to a procreative form of masturbation to produce all the elements of reality.
Many of the oldest Creation Myths depict gods who created things via various forms of human bodily functions, such as sneezing, spitting, even vomiting.
Two: The Māori Creation Myth
The Māori (New Zealand Polynesian) description of the development of the universe is expressed in a patient, step-by-step genealogical form: In the beginning, there was Te Kore (The Nothing; the Void) which became Te Korematua (The Parentless Void) in its search for procreation. From it came Te Pō (The Night), becoming Te Pōroa (The Long Night), and then becoming Te Pōnui (The Great Night). Gradually Te Ao (The Light) glimmered into existence, stretching to all corners of the universe to become Te Aotūroa (The Long-Standing Light). Next came Te Ata (The Dawn), from which came Te Mākū (The Moisture), and Mahoranuiatea (Cloud of the Dawn). Te Mākū and Mahoranuiatea wed to form Rangi, the Sky Father, who, in turn wed Papa, the Earth Mother, and together they produced the gods, and eventually all the familiar things in the world.
Three: Norse Mythology
![]() |
| “Odin the Wanderer”, adapted from the 1886 Georg von Rosen black and white drawing. Note his left eye is missing. The story goes that he sacrificed it in order to gain wisdom. |
The Norse Creation Myth is one that has mostly survived by repeated retelling of now lost versions, both written and oral.
Odin seems to get the most press. He was a creator being, but he was several steps down from the original creation. The story begins in a great void called Ginnungagap, flanked by the icy realm of Niflheim and the fiery realm of Muspelheim. When hot air and freezing ice met in the void, they created the primordial frost giant Ymir. Long story short, Ymir was a cruel creature, and Odin, along with his two brothers, who were actually grandsons of the first god Buri, slayed Ymir and built the physical world from his body. Later, Odin created the first humans, named Ask and Embla, from two trees, an ash and an elm, which he found on the beach.
We haven’t even mentioned the great central World Tree, Ygdrasil in whose branches Odin spent some very important ‘entanglement’ time. It’s a complicated mythology, made up of many separate but interwoven stories passed down by word of mouth for countless generations, as are many of the world’s great origin tales.
In this case, most of what survives is reconstructed from written narratives called the Prose and Poetic Eddas, the oldest of which was recorded around the thirteenth Century AD. The most famous of these, the Völuspá, is presented as mystical Seeress recounting ancient tales from memory, with her audience being none other than Odin himself.
Now, the “non-Myth”—Science
Science’s current mainstream Creation Story is called “The Standard Model of Cosmology”. It goes something like this:
“Suddenly, 13.8 billion years ago, there was a Big Bang. That wasn’t the first thing. It’s the first thing we have direct evidence for. The cooling remnants of that hot primordial explosion, or fireball, is all around us. It is a bath of radiation called the ‘Cosmic Microwave Background’ that has now cooled to just 2.7255 degrees above absolute zero.”
The fact that we’re immersed inside this ongoing event, and not outside observers, the way we are for most scientific experiments, is an underappreciated and critically fundamental distinction, which we’ll be exploring quite a lot more in coming songs.
Science avoids storytelling that it cannot back up with solid evidence. Nevertheless, if you ask scientists what happened before the Big Bang, you’ll find that there are plenty of theories, and here at the Song of Everything, we be picking through those to glean clues from what is known. Then we’ll venture to tell a far more complete story than rigorous science admits. It might be wrong, but it will be our sincere best stab at what seems sensible. We’ll back our version up with evidence, including new discoveries as they become available, and we’ll share our sources and our reasoning; but we’ll also acknowledge that this is just one choice among many.
So, what’s with this Cosmic garden appearing in the sky?
It’s a sort of metaphor, of course. It starts with that “Formless Void” which could be described as a substrate, kind of like a ‘soil,’ that is the simplest possible place for things to ‘sprout’.
Let’s give it a different name, though. In fact, let’s give it a pair of names. One is dry and technical—precise but bland—and the other is a ‘pet name’ and has plenty of personality.
We name it the “Uncaused Continuum”, a description as much as a name, really. And more whimsically, we’ll describe her as a Mama Pink Easter Bunny called “Little Miss Nothingness.” Though these are new names, the underlying idea should already be a familiar thing to most average folk.
Little Miss Nothingness and her irrepressible Minions.
Start by thinking of a vacuum—plain-old emptiness. Emptiness is a wonderfully mysterious thing to contemplate, because whatever you think it does—that’s exactly what it doesn’t do!
| Try to tell her what to do, or how to be, and Li’l Miss Nothing scoffs at you. She obeys no rules. |
As soon as you try to give this bizarre entity a rule (any form of description), you’ve destroyed it—it’s no longer the nothingness you started with. Yet, because it has no rules, you can divide it up into parts!
What? Of course you can. It lacks any rules to prevent you!
That’s right. Little Miss Nothingness has babies! Hordes of them! This is our ‘soil’ with its seeds ready to sprout.
We won’t go much further down this philosophical/conceptual Rabbit Hole for now.
But we do want to add a few more introductory points:
Studying Nothingness in the lab.
Scientific study of the vacuum (of empty space) has been most productive not in the large-scale astrophysical or cosmological sense, but in the close-up examination given to it in the study of the smallest particles. Turns out that the closer you look at this wonderfully mysterious thing (i.e., when you chop off a very little part of it and study it), the more complicated and interesting it gets. No details yet. This is just a teaser.
The vacuum that Science can observe from our vantage point (our reference frame in this universe) hints at, or naturally generalizes into, the presence of that more fundamental precursor origin-ground (Womb) that is ‘on the outside’—independent of any vantage point.
One of our less Comfortable (brain-twisting) excursions beyond what Science can tell us.
One might wonder about a concept that is supposed to be the precursor to the first stuff that we can observe and know about: How do we demonstrate that this prior ‘state’ exists?
We don’t!
Put perfectly bluntly: It does NOT exist. At least not in the conventional sense, because ‘existence’ is a rule, or a descriptive attribute; and the ‘Uncaused Continuum’ has no rules at all—full dead stop.
But that does not make it irrelevant!
How? Well, first of all, here we are talking about it! What in the *bleep* would be the point of talking about something if it does not exist and has no relevance to our story?
It’s not irrelevant because neither does it not NOT exist. That would be a rule too. There simply is no ‘truth’ about the matter of whether it exists or not.
The philosophical blur that we’re focusing in on can be resolved by specifying a *threshold*—a boundary where we cross from not being useful or relevant, to being the Spark—the seed—that gets our story started. More on that in a minute.
Those little Minions are on a mission!
It boils down to this: The Uncaused Continuum is very much like a fertile soil where particular seeds (little pieces of the Continuum) that have the right stuff can “sprout,” by which we mean “establish a useful, self-consistent structure.”
The role of the soil is to accommodate this growth by letting the germinating seed try out within its own self-description, different properties that we Humans (who are not entirely neutral observers) would describe as “real”—physical, ‘tangible’ characteristics.
The seeds can do this magic (and the Continuum fails to prevent it) because, of course, the Continuum harbors no rules to govern which ‘ideas’ little bits of it might explore.
We’re not neutral because every one of us has some notion of what existence or reality is, but those ideas are biases based on our experience.
The Many Names of Nothingness
Okay. Now we’ve wandered down several more seriously important philosophical/conceptual Rabbit Holes. Sorry, but this “In the beginning …” stuff is an amazingly stubborn Gordian Knot. We’ll be coming back to talk about it several more times before we have our descriptive ‘sword’ sharp enough that we can play ‘Alexander the Great’ and cut cleanly through it.
Speaking of which … as we composed the earlier versions of this story (See PART ONE), we started our discussion by calling this Nothingness—this Beginning Thing—the ‘Portal to the 0th Dimension’, then we styled it as the ‘Great Empty Everything,’ and later we began regularly referring to it as the ‘Vacuum with a capital V—the Big-V Vacuum.’
This barely scratches the surface of the names that are out there. Throughout history, poets, philosophers, and prophets great and small in cultures worldwide have given it many other names, and we’ll be discussing some of them.
But, for the moment, the “Uncaused Continuum” is the serious (technical) name that we prefer, because we think it is the simplest, most basic starting point.
Why we think this is at the core of EVERY origin story
In fact, we wonder: is there actually any alternative? If one delves into the other options that have been offered in the literature, it seems possible to find roots for them right here, in this same enigmatic, lawless, chaotic, and yet wonderfully unrestricted COMFORTABLE place.
For example: other stories might insist that ‘there is no beginning.’ They would portray an eternal universe or an eternally existing deity.
But that doesn’t stand up to careful scrutiny.
What is the relevance of something physical that is infinitely far away or infinitely removed in the past, or both?
If it has those properties, it is only the ‘closer’ parts of its *continuum* of existence, that become relevant. This ‘becoming relevant’ is described by some intrinsically arbitrary threshold that gets crossed, in which the first demonstrable (useful to an origin story) *cause* and its effect can be identified.
There you go. Anything prior to the place and/or time where the threshold is crossed is … an amorphous blur—an effectively Uncaused Continuum!
Narrowing the focus, Part One.
In our telling of the Origin Story—our Song of Everything—the goal is to seek a generalization of the foundational ground. But, from there, it is not possible to consider every ‘Minion’ that sprouts a functioning reality. The possibilities seem illimitable!
The story-tellers abound. Ask Google AI how many cultures have documented Creation Myths and … Well, it told me that there is no count, but that virtually every culture has one. We celebrate them and encourage them all.
But just as every story needs a starting point, every story needs a path—a waymarked route from A to B, as we touched on in Song 0.
And so, we reduce the illimitable options, and focus on just three specific sprouts, or branches to our “tree of existence.”
These three, and only these, are the pathways that we are going to keep tabs on and play with as we go along:
One: A Traditional CREATOR BEING
E.g. Odin, or Brahman, or the Islamic-Judeo-Christian God/Yahweh/Allah, etc. In this telling, whatever our Creator Being of choice happens to be, he/she/it is a sophisticated form of “Boltzmann Brain,” which could, at least in theory, have been the first useful thing that randomly fluctuated into existence—the first seed that sprouted from the Cosmic soil.
Two: Pink Easter Bunnies.
We’ve already introduced our cute little Miss Nothingness.
She and her babies are a useful construct, as you’ll see. Our Bunnies take the “complex being fluctuating into existence” story (sprouting out of the Uncaused Continuum or anywhere else) to neutral ground. We’ll be picking one of these bright-eyed little minions and following his/her adventures in detail.
Three: the ‘bare-bones’ Uncaused Continuum.
Our serious one—our simplest emergent particle construction, or sprouting seed, which we argue is most probable because it has the fewest moving parts to start with—perhaps just two.
This is what Physicists call a Feynman Diagram. This particular diagram shows an example from a calculation applied our universe. In it, two electrons come into the picture from the bottom, moving toward the top and toward each other. They ‘collide’ and bounce off each other, both changing direction (the two solid lines at left and right changing direction).
Quantum Mechanics tells us that what is actually happening is not a direct ‘collision,’ the way two billiard balls might collide, but an exchange of a calculable but not observable (the term used is “virtual”) energy packet (in this case a ‘Photon’—a particle of light). The path of the Photon is represented by the wavy horizontal line labeled with the symbol ‘γ.’
In some cases, further *virtual* complications can occur. In fact, Quantum Mechanics tells us that an infinite number of further complications *do* inevitably occur. This is the ‘interesting’ stuff that happens when you home in on a small piece of the vacuum in the space between the two electrons, or in the Big-V Vacuum where there’s just nothing at all ... until, suddenly … The light beam (or the emptiness of the Uncaused Continuum) momentarily ‘sprouts’ a pair of ‘virtual particles’—In the case of the above diagram, what sprouts is an electron and its anti-matter counterpart, the positron. These things flicker at the fringes of existence and then disappear by annihilating each other in such a short fraction of a second that they aren’t even observable.
That sprout (the appearance of particles that weren’t there before) is represented by the circular part of the drawing in the middle, and if you take away the two ‘colliding’ electrons, you still have a valid process, which is called a Vacuum Diagram or Bubble Diagram.
Here, we’re fading out the external stuff, and we’ve colored the interior of the Vacuum Bubble lavender. That lavender Bubble is the ‘soil’ that starts our story!
Inside the bubble, while the virtual electron and its positron partner are doing their thing, they can, and inevitably do, sprout further virtual entities. Here, we show the electron sprouting another photon, which then produces a new bubble made of a Quark-Antiquark pair. Then, inside that smaller bubble, more things can and do sprout, including, sometimes, more complicated combinations of things that all appear together.
Hopefully, you get the basic idea. Looking really closely at a tiny piece of the ‘Uncaused Continuum,’ these ‘Vacuum Bubbles’ are forever springing into existence; and within them, further, more complicated stuff can sprout. Including some useful and interesting stuff.
We won’t go much farther for now. This is just the introduction—a teaser. These Vacuum Bubbles are the Minions, the seeds—the tiny bits of the soil that sprout any imaginable (really just any possible) sort of complex stuff within its bubble.
Where to learn more (Cited Sources), and a first reveal of our distinctive twist on the Origin Story.
For further study, ask your favorite AI to tell you about Vacuum Bubble Feynman Diagrams. Choose an AI such as Google AI, which will cite the sources of its information:
Our new outside-the-box innovation—our completely fresh take on the Origin Story, which (we believe) is an entirely new proposal, is what we’re calling “Space-Time Inversion Symmetry.”
The Concept boils down to this: If you’re inside that little mischievous lavender circle in the Feynman Diagram, and if you’re a *complex* virtual entity that we’ll call “I” that has flickered into a useful (to you) existence inside that Vacuum Bubble, then there is a perspective in which that emergent entity “I” is not virtual at all, but entirely physically real, and there is no way to distinguish between that physically relevant “I” and the fleeting equivalent virtual entity “U” that an external agent (like a scientist in a lab) observes when studying the Vacuum … no difference of any kind other than the *perspective*. The “I” uses your internal perspective as its reference frame. And, of course, you’re not ‘virtual’ at all, because there you are living it!
The Inversion is first and foremost an inversion of observer and observed. What appears virtual and fleeting from the outside, is Space-Time Inverted ‘actual’ reality from an observer’s perspective on the inside, seemingly surrounded by and encased in those (not necessarily observable, thanks to various ‘censorship limits’ on your perspective) wider shells of supporting/originating processes.
Pioneering female mathematician Emmy Noether’s famous 1918 Theorem demonstrates that Momentum and Energy are scrupulously conserved during Space-Time Inversion. No matter whether we’re on the inside looking out, or outside-the-box looking in with Space-Time reference frames that are the inverse of one another, the physical picture appears the same to any observer. Yes, reality (Existence) really is all about perspective!
And we’re just one of the Minions!
“Plain and simple” wins the argument
It took us nearly 4000 words to get around to finally being ready to properly start our story. But then it takes just 51 magical words to actually do it:
The Uncaused Continuum prevails. In it, virtual Vacuum Bubbles constantly appear. Within one, a complex combination of virtual entities fluctuated into a fleeting moment of coherence, forming a self-sustaining self-useful structure. And from that emergent object’s perspective, a physical world sprouted—none other than our whole crazy, complex, Comfortable Universe!
![]() |
| “I am You (U) as viewed from the Inside Out!” A depiction of the emergence of Space-Time Inversion Symmetry. We’ll be returning to this idea later for a more in-depth look. |
We choose this third—this more generalized ‘garden ground’ as the serious basis of our story, with the other two stories playing supporting roles where they are useful (as in the illustration above). THE ONLY REASONABLE JUSTIFICATION for rejecting the other two, or any of a vast variety of entities that could sprout in the garden and be the basis for an intriguing tale, is its simplicity.
As we’ll be striving to demonstrate, the Uncaused Continuum has the very minimum qualities or attributes needed to build a universe—i.e., to act as a ‘Creator Being’. It’s ‘God’ without any of his unexplainable (and/or anthropomorphic) baggage. It’s Easter Bunnies without the Glitz and Bling.
Narrowing the focus, Part Two.
Thus, our story begins—with a piece of chosen ground. We plant our seed and see how it grows. We’ll now highlight THREE further limitations to the story we choose to tell, which narrow the focus.
One: The Individual perspective takes precedence.
Here, we’re talking not just the big picture, but getting very personal. Precedence (preference or priority, preferred status) is unequivocally granted to *you,* the Individual over any collective consensus …
… when there is a conflict (they do not always conflict).
But when they do clash, we demand that NO INSTITUTION supersedes the individual.
And we offer this warning advice: ***The individual gives up his/her authority to any institution or collective at their peril!***
There are two key reasons for why the Individual is granted this priority status:
First is the origin itself, in the form we’ve just introduced it: the Uncaused Continuum.
We have made a case that a Vacuum Bubble sprouting in the Uncaused Continuum is the simplest possible starting point (or ground) on which to build an origin story.
We’ve also noted that the U.C. has the mysterious property of having no properties—containing no rules, obeying no rules.
It is not even random, because randomness would be a defining property.
And most importantly: It is NOT the so-called “FIRST CAUSE”! This is critical. The Uncaused Continuum causes nothing!
Rather, each entity that emerges from the Uncaused Continuum must work out its own causal structure (its rules for causation or lack thereof), and THIS is the basis (the fact that each individual entity does all its own work from scratch) for ELEVATING (granting predominance to) that individual. They were there from the very onset (of their own emergent perspective.) And so, we must, by rights, defer.
Second is the role the distinctive individual plays in virtually all breakthrough changes. Evolution and emergence are achieved by the individual outliers or anomalies. The consensus, the collective, represent the stodgy, inflexible forces that resist change—that insist that the status quo ‘ain’t broke’ so why change it. The individual’s new idea may or may not work, but when it does, it is the agent of revolution.
In the realm of science (and physics, in particular), this is considered a controversial stance. The status of ‘observers’ (in quantum mechanics in particular), remains a subject of hot debate. Science seeks to define an observer-independent reality. Yet every scientist who ever considered this reality is an independent individual observer. There is nothing else, inside-out, or outside in. We’ll leave it there for now. Just another teaser.
Two: We adhere to the tight constraints of Physicalism
This means that anything that appears to be supernatural, magical, or paranormal, has to have a physical basis, even if we don’t know what it is yet; and that severely restricts such things.
For example, as we have already touched on, in all practical ways of describing an entirely Physical World there are no physical things that are Infinite. In general, we see a clear distinction between Absolutes and physical things.
This means that any universe that we perceive must have had an effective beginning (great – that justifies the whole function of this here Song 1!) and it also has an effective end, beyond which it no longer functions in any useful way.
Absolutes are the bailiwick of Mathematics. The following is a CRUCIAL philosophical underpinning of our Song of Everything: In the physical world, all mathematics is approximate, and the appropriate approximate formulation (one prominent example is the ‘trick’ that Particle Physicists call ‘Renormalization’) is actually the very most accurate representation of our observed physical world. We’ll claim that nature renormalized its processes long before physicists worked out the math.
Let’s repeat. All Math in our down-to-Earth physical world is APPROXIMATE. Even the Number ‘1’ is an approximation. What could be more basic than that? One way of expressing that is that the number ‘1’ does not and cannot have an infinite precision—carried out to unlimited decimal places. A much more entertaining and Comfortable and way of looking at it is by picking up a stick, contemplating it … “look, here we have one stick” … and then breaking it in two.
We’ll leave it there (for the moment); but the underlying consequences of that are profound. In quantum physics, ‘Unitarity’—the proposition that the probability of all outcomes sums to *exactly* one—is one of the most basic. On a human level, the significance is that even the Individual, who we’ve granted precedence and priority over the choices of how to describe the world, is inevitably never a perfect (absolute) reporter.
We’re hinting, here, at a profound quagmire that surrounds the root of our sprouting seedling. We’ve already touched on this in the Prologue. Our ‘soil’ is NOT solid ground. It is, in fact a strong equivalent to ‘quicksand’, in which the more you struggle with it, the more quickly you sink in and drown. The individual is best served by maintaining a balance between deep penetrating thought (the struggle to explain our world) and the pursuit of productive enterprise, experiences, and relationships—elements of the living experience that are far more important than thought.
And this directly leads us to the third constraint, or focus, that we impose on our particular telling of the story.
Three: We aim for BALANCE!
How can we say this gracefully?
Human thought is a biological junk pile—a vastly overrated tool.
It is prone to any number of distortions, biases, and unchecked excesses.
In constructing our Song of Everything, we are heavily relying on this tool, of course. But we’re marching forward with eyes wide open.
The discipline that pursues human thought to its maximum potential is called ‘Philosophy’. But there is far more to life than thought. Indeed, three aspects of physical experience, perhaps gilded with a carefully curated frosting of thought, are far more fundamental to the story of Human Existence.
The three-layer cake.
Our lives are mostly about three things that are more basic than thought (though they often employ thought as a tool).
The first is primal—our ancient in-the-moment alertness. (Stalking prey, searching for edible tidbits.) We’re still hunter-gatherers at our core.
The second is Human interaction: Communication, sex, competition/politics, (what else?). Again, agile alertness is at a premium.
Third. Sleep! Down-time is a built-in essential.
Then comes the frosting: Thought—that cobbled-together biological junk pile: planning, analysis, constructing mental models of our world, solving problems. These are luxuries that we can afford to devote time to only when there is no pressing physical business. This is actually (in my experience) most compatible with the primal parts of life—out foraging in nature or on the fringes of that essential sleep time.
But it’s the physical business that gets the results. A well-lived life keeps us ‘in the moment’ and not ‘lost in thought’ most of the time …
… and so, a well-told balanced story of “Life, the Universe, and Everything” shouldn’t be smothered by ‘ideas and theorizing’ even though thought is the tool we most often depend on when we’re ready to stand up and tell our story.
A little Guidance from one of humanity’s greatest thinkers.
Sir Isaac Newton, writing in 1704 in the Twenty-eighth Query of his treatise called Opticks tells us:
“The main business of Natural Philosophy is to argue from Phenomena without feigning Hypotheses, and to deduce Causes from Effects...”
He called it Natural Philosophy.
It’s kind of an antiquated term, but in this case, we believe the older way of thinking about the World is better, because it is broader and more balanced.
For our Song of Everything, we want to do “philosophy”—to employ this discipline to the maximum extent possible—while sticking close to Nature, i.e., without becoming ‘Lost in Thought.’
The mission is to stay ‘Natural’—to avoid made-up ideas (feigning hypotheses), and yet we thrive on the use of (creative) thought to propose fact-based but outside-the-box hypotheses that build on the most current knowledge. These aren’t agenda-driven efforts to attain pre-determined targets. They aren’t supernatural or mystical ‘fantasies.’ In general, they’re not disingenuous proposals of the sort that (I think) Newton had in mind.
We at Comfortable Universe Headquarters are working very hard to assimilate the latest scientific knowledge while retaining a wider, more balanced focus. In this information saturated age, people far too often dismiss other people’s stories before they even giving them any serious consideration. It’s a sad state of affairs. It takes experience and focus, and, most of all, patience, to delve deeply enough into a story to properly evaluate it.
Should we promote our story? Advertise? Work to build a following? It’s a matter of priority. At this point in the telling of our story, we’re still more interested in exploring the ideas than in convincing others. By the very nature of this wide-ranging, highly interdisciplinary story, nobody’s going to be entirely satisfied with what they find here. We take seriously our own rule that the Individual takes precedence. Our Song of Everything is one individual’s sometimes radical excursions from the collective mindscape.
We do want our story to stand out—to have new things to say. And we want to keep from getting ‘Lost in the Weeds.’ Nuance has an important place in this discussion, but Nuance for its own sake is … well … it’s often how philosophers make their mark in today’s crowded and competitive ‘marketplace’ of ideas.
But it can lead to over-specialization and, sometimes, ‘Paralysis by Analysis.’
Have philosophers ‘lost the plot?’ Well, I think they’ll tell you it’s like ‘basic research’ or like the pursuit of branches of mathematics that have no known physical application. (Or like some readers’ perspective on our Comfortable Universe Song of Everything!) You never know how, when, or where a radical excursion from the collective mindscape might turn out to be useful.
But yes. It’s largely frosting on the cake. Let time be the arbiter. Useful new perspectives will find their place in a balanced approach to existence … but meanwhile, let’s get out there and explore some more of that exciting and mysterious garden!


_edited.jpg)
















